jonbryon

I've never really looked into this and can't visualise the HB flap problem. If the wings are modelled swept with all the flaps/slats closed, does the problem go away? Jon

Oh you can definitely tell which is which, unless remedial action is taken. Jon

Lots of modellers think they can do this and it will be fine. The reality is often very different. Getting a joint on a seam line to look invisible close up is extremely difficult (to the point where I've almost never seen it done to my satisfaction). Eliminating a seam is *much* easier than making it look like moulded recessed detail. Jon

I think BAM announced intakes a long time ago, but they have never materialised. Intakes are what I am waiting for... Jon

They seem to have persisted for a good few years into the late 40s. I've not researched photos for them, but there must be *some* out there! Jon

I think it would be wonderful if a decal manufacturer produced post-war markings for the P-61. Strangely neglected... Jon

F-4N...? (And the original F-4G if we're being pedantic.) Jon

I'm not sure I follow your questions. I've made 157347. In PT31, Hasegawa definitely tell you to use the wrong engines, but the correct engines are in the box. I think the nose parts are correct for 157347 as indicated. Two styles are included, which means I think you can make any of the last 12 RF-4Bs, but maybe I misunderstood you? You are correct about the thick wing. Jon

Aren't the ICM B-26K control sticks a bit inaccurate? Could we do with some new ones? Jon

Correct engines for a 1/48 C-21 Learjet (to fit the Hasegawa/Revell kit) would be a wonderful accompaniment to CD48096. Jon

Chris Becker has highlighted the poor fit and engineering on his YouTube channel, and Bernhard Schrock did the same in his superlative build I linked above. The refuelling probe is an improvement, as was the tail rotor. The exhausts saved some seam work, but they missed an opportunity to engineer them to fit after the fuselage halves/pod halves are joined. The intakes were rubbish and the main rotor hub deeply disappointing. Jon

Thanks 🙂 The decals were great to use and I loved the choice of aircraft available. Jon

Are you planning on releasing the parts relevant for the AH-1G in a separate set? Cheers Jon

It's the ResKit set, but detailed with some wire, ANYZ connectors and plastic card. To be honest, the ResKit set was a disappointment. It's way simpler than the real thing and lacks even some of the more obvious morphology that Academy managed to mould. There are quite striking 3D print lines. The worst aspect is it's not engineered to fit the kit at all - the rotor mast is a lovely casting that fits to absolutely nothing. They replicated the actuating arms with very poor PE - I replaced the more obvious ones with brass tube. My efforts are still very poor compared to

Thanks everyone for the feedback - I've very much enjoyed reading it. I know I should have put a decent exhaust stain on for the #2 engine, but for some reason I didn't feel like doing it - maybe the fear of messing it up! It's a fragile monster - I've already snapped the sensor arm off once. I used magnets for the refuelling probe, the blades into the hub, and the hub to the rotor shaft: Cheers Jon