bushande

Members
  • Content count

    314
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About bushande

  • Rank
    Tenax Sniffer (Open a window!)
  • Birthday

Recent Profile Visitors

4,996 profile views
  1. Awesome finish. Really cool bird. Congrats!!!
  2. I would assume, this shot has rather been taken during the 76/77 cruise. Which means that these were already other birds. You can rework it but it needs more extras and changes than the 1980s edition of the kit. They included the fuselage halfes with the late NACCA gun grills and the beaver tail has the ECM blister.
  3. Thanks a lot Stefan, happy if it is still liked. As said, today I would do a crap load way differently. Anyways, your observation on the upper surface control panels in LGG on 7980 is actually rather a trick of light. I got shots of her roll out where it is clearly visible that 7980 has the standard white panels as well.
  4. Most welcome. Really cool looking bird actually.
  5. Well ominous just because of the radome. Has been fairly unusual for the Wichitas without the white belly. Is all. Don't get me started on those darned prototypes. I have amassed so much reference on them over the years, I even have a piece of no. 1s center beam and some shreds of 7989, i.e. no. 10 (the one that crashed short after the first carrier trials) and there's still hardly a time I look at all the stuff and don't find something new which differs from the rest and in between them and that needs to be considered. As far as I can make out of the shots I have, the mock up had an individual tail and hence individual speedbrake, 7980, i.e. no. 1 had it's own style of a speedbrake, namely a big flat almost foursquare panel, 7981, i.e. no. 2 had yet again a different layout of the speedbrake due to the spin chute in the tail, no. 3 had a different layout of the tail as well resulting in yet again another panel for the speedbrake, which seems to not be as broad as no. 1s but also not as lean towards the upper end as no. 2s. It seems that around no. 5 the typical speedbrake layout for the boat tail had finally been established. effin' Tomcats. Gotta hate them.
  6. Well, it's a pity .... I found quite a pile of the regular Gayblades from the mid 70s and also plenty of the squadron birds in the bicentennial colors, albeit I'm afraid there's not much of your specific serial in that bicentennial camo in addition to the one you already have. I got a lot of 9612 as a VF-33 and -102 bird and also some of her in the regular early VF-32 colors with the yellow stripes but there's only so much of her in the bicentennial scheme, i,e, with the red and blue stripes and the extra swords. However, I was able to dig up a shot of the starboard site, two shots on the carrier and two close ups. Seems the bird was only one of a handful that already had the two louvre gun grill and you are free to properly weather the bird as it seems. Also note that despite the overal gloss finish at least the tailfin must have lost the gloss rather quickly. Hence maybe a soft satin shine would be more appropriate for your model?! Hope that helps and happy modelling.
  7. I actually saw the red striping also on - admittedly very very few - images of other squadron's birds. That striping goes over those areas that cover the center wingbox. This spot is not covered by removable panels but the fuselage skin is directly applied over the titanium wingbox. It was basically just supposed to indicate that there is nothing for maintainers to look for.
  8. That pretty much remains the question. According to some albeit UNCONFIRMED sources VF-1 did some strafing on yet never further clarified ground targets. But as said, it all remains a rumor so far. The tan nose didn't seem to meet much love with VF-2. There are only very few shots of some VF-2 birds during the work up and transition time that show the tan nose but it seems they got omitted rather quickly. My opinion: If you want to stay authentic, rather leave the tan nose away. Another shortlived attempt in '83: Oh btw, here is also that ominous 1978 VF-1 birdy with the tan nose. Just the same here. I personally think it is just a curious "flower" during transition / repaint. Curious nonetheless.
  9. Thats correct John. There are several good ressources here on ARC that clarify the issue as that has been a frequent question by many modellers. If you search for "boattail" here on ARC I'm sure some threads will surface. Most folks usually refer to the well known MATS site of Torsten Anft. I think he has some decent drawings there as well, that illustrate at least the major differences for those that are not complete Tomcat nuts. http://www.anft.net/f-14/f14-detail-beavertail.htm The broader boat tails had only been installed by Grumman for a rather brief time on only the first few lots of production ships (prototypes had boat tail layouts that differed even from the boat tails of the early production blocks and even from prototype to prototype!). However some earlier ships that hit the fleet before the change to the leaner beaver tail design and wouldn't get a proper upgrade, flew with the boat tail until the late eighties. The dialectic panels had been removed very early and permanently partially before and no later than during the first cruise. Your rendition of 8992 in August '75 would imply a boat tail albeit without the dialectic panels. It's no sorcery John. What I learned works as a good pattern for sucha scratch work are old laundry pecs for example. Just cut and sand and clue and the biggest part would already be done in 1/72.
  10. I think you mix this up a little John. The picture of your model shows a standard beaver tail similar to the one provided in the 1/48 Tamiya kit. The so called boat tail was the broader one. In general it is possible yes, depending on skill, time and patience. The easiest way I guess would be to just cut the smaller beaver tail section and replace it with a scratched plastic part. At least going for the first few ships that hit VF-1 and -2 during the work up phase and very early on cruise you could choose then whether you want dialectic panels on it or rather not. I once did that with a 1/32 Revell Tomcat which I converted to a depiction of 158627 as it flew during the work up phase in late '73 / early '74 just short before the first cruise. During that time a lot of configurations and load outs where tried by the squadron to accomodate with the then new jet. That was also the time when the first - mind it OPERATIONAL! - missile test shots had been conducted by the squadron. I know I dig that one out rather often but please bear with me, I'm a snails pace modeller and hence don't have a lot to show as ref. http://www.aircraftresourcecenter.com/Gal9/8701-8800/gal8798-F-14-Breunig/00.shtm Just scroll down to about the middle of the thread after the VX-9 Delta. I was in touch with the crew who transferred 158627 from Bethpage to Miramar and who conducted the first missile shots in the squadron during work up phase. I think ... well .... hope it's a fairly accurate representation of the original between end of '73 / early '74. Modellingwise I changed wuite a lot after I posted these pictures years ago and I would do A LOT way different and hopefully better today and I had to scratch and print a lot myself as it has not been available at the time of build but despite being in 1/32 it might show that a scratch boat tail is far from impossible.
  11. Please stand by a little. I might have one or two?! Need to rummage through the pile.
  12. Be careful Stefan. If you really want to do one of the very early protos you are set for quite a pile of rework. The extended overwing fairings are just one of the more obvious changes but far from everything that needs to be considered. There are changes in the cockpit including a second "HUD" for the Rio, larger strackes on the wingbox, partially a different engine layout as the early P412 version of the TF30 missed some of the overlay feathers past the brace, antennae are different, the stencils were applied differently, they had an extra formation light on each side and depending on which serial it is going to be the antennae on the tailfin and the boat tail itself looked extensively different. Practically each of at least the first half of the 12 protos looked different to its sisters in one or other aspect. Almost none of them were the like. Well ... prototypes.
  13. Not necessarily Darren. I remember to have shot of a '78 VF-1 bird with already overal gull grey but with tan nose somewhere in the pile but can't find it at the moment. Yet I think it was not common though and I might even go so far as to say the photo was just a lucky shot during that "transition" phase. During the third and last cruise of VF-1 aboard Enterprise the tan noses were generally gone. I got some shots of that cruise and I cannot find any Tomcat with a tan nose in both squadrons.
  14. You will need a boat tail plus 7 louvre grill for Wichita 100 during the first cruise (IRST on off and dialectic panels on / off boat tail as you please) and Gayblade 204 (like that more than Gypsy hihi ) requires a 7 louvre gun grill, beaver tail is o.k.. (BTW: 159015 later on became the ominous "Deer Hunter" of VF-101 after it went through substantial Block upgrade)
  15. Thats an awesome list Darran. However! As Darren stated, that is how they rolled of the production line in Bethpage. First changes and upgrades hit the fleet rather quickly though. For instance the short gun muzzle was only installed on very few birds when they hit the fleet and were replaced almost as soon as they entered squadron service. When it comes to Tomcats and Navy birds in general I would always suggest to look for an Original you like, track down the BuNo and at least as much importantly the time when the Original is supposed to be depicted. Do the research and than evaluate which model kit requires the least changes (not referring to the general quality of a kit here though!). If you just model randomly only according to a certain BuNo you've come to like without checking the timeframe and potential reference of the original or a camo you like you'll most likely end up doing a "flawed" version of the original as you might end up not having incorporated a certain specific the bird had already at the time the serial whore the camo you prefer or the other way around for that matter. It's tough for the modeller who wishes to stay authentic but hey, it's the Navy, what else but an "adventure" do you expect?!