Jump to content

Paul Boyer

Members
  • Content Count

    1,062
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

About Paul Boyer

  • Rank
    Full Blown Model Geek
  • Birthday 05/26/1949

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Weeesconsin
  • Interests
    1/72 scale U.S. military aircraft, Rickenbacker bass guitars, birding, trivia

Recent Profile Visitors

11,120 profile views
  1. I should think the gun would work if properly aimed. The Navy's CWIS (?) is a gatling gun designed to shoot down incoming anti-ship missiles, so . . . .
  2. The thing I question is wouldn't the gun be a better solution? A lot less expensive than a million (?) dollar missile against an non-maneuvering, simple flying bomb. I dunno.
  3. One of the pictures shows a Harrier carrying an AIM-120 AMRAAM. It reads that the Harriers were modified for air defense, so yeah!
  4. Guess I'll have to buy another couple BPK kits! I've got to get the C-40 and I've got the T-43 and built the P-8 Poseidon. And I'll need another shelf.😐
  5. So will this be the new AWACS for the USAF?
  6. Yes, the AC stands for aircraft.
  7. It's the "new" Microscale that comes out with "new" sheets. They are mostly railroad decals, but still bring out "military" aircraft, too. Check it out. You'll see some redos of subjects we first saw from them back in the '70s and '80s, rearranged a bit, but can't vouch for the accuracy: https://www.microscale.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Category_Code=MILITARY
  8. It's ALMOST enough to make me build another Monogram BUFF. Maybe I'll just "remark" this one:
  9. No offense comprehended! I just can't buy decals for a kit I won't buy!😊
  10. Externally, the VC-9 and C-9A Med Evac would differ mainly in markings. The bad news is that this is a Mach 2 kit.🙁
  11. "Would love to see some of the NAVY F-104....." Well, you get two out of three Navy jets on the sheet.
  12. I didn't notice any major inaccuracies on the Special Hobby kit. Why isn't the intake "right"?
×
×
  • Create New...