Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Straight from the source:

http://www.trumpeter-china.com/a/en/news/20120412/2107.html

Probably a scale down of the 32nd errors, but certainly better than ESCI/Italeri offering

What errors are there in the 32nd scale kit? I know that "Zactoman" did some intakes, But I think in the shrink down to 1/48th cale those shape errors will be less noticable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What errors are there in the 32nd scale kit? I know that "Zactoman" did some intakes, But I think in the shrink down to 1/48th cale those shape errors will be less noticable.

I was referring to the need for corrected intakes in the 32nd scale kit. I haven't looked for any others. You're quite right that it may not be as much of an issue with the smaller, newer kit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wish they fix some errors from 1/32 kit, nose and front fuse,spine....and even if they don't I will get all the versions they release and all the resin upgrades- just like i did too many times...great news indeed! I think there is huge market for 1/48 Floggers...

Edited by Petarvu
Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wish they fix some errors from 1/32 kit, nose and front fuse,spine....and even if they don't I will get all the versions they release and all the resin upgrades- just like i did too many times...great news indeed! I think there is huge market for 1/48 Floggers...

They have virtually no history of correcting errors when they scale their kits down, so I wouldn't count on them doing it this time. We can always hope, but I would not bet a penny on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankly the errors in the 1/32 kit are NOT all that significant - especially when compared to some of their other bombs. There is an intake front profile shape that's a little bothersome, in 1/32 it takes a small chunk of styrene and a little sanding. In 1/48, it might only require sanding. It's REALLY easy. I think this will be a fantastic offering, and hopefully will lead to a full line of Floggers in 1/48 of ALL types.

What I find interesting is that they announced it as a MiG-23M - when they DO NOT have a MiG-23M in 1/32, only a MiG-23MF. Granted the only discernable difference are the hinge dampers for the rudder (mistakenly referred to as the double hinge) on the MF, so this will require a different vertical and rudder from the MF. Will be interesting to see if they go that far. If you want a Soviet Cold War Flogger, this will be your bird. If you want a Warpac bird, or a Afghan, or similar, then you'll have to wait for the inevitable MF, ML and MLD...

Now if they'd just get their attack Floggers going in 1/32!

I'm sure others will be able to complain much more deeply about the "myriad" of inaccuracies on the 1/32 MiG-23, but for 95% of modelers, it will be a VERY nice kit, certainly one of their better efforts. It's received tremendous support from the aftermarket, so we have some hope of the same for the 1/48 kit.

GREAT NEWS!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was only a matter of time. I am looking forward to seeing the kit. Now that there is a new kit coming out; perhaps those of you who have been hoarding the Kazan update sets will consider parting with them on Ebay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The MiG-31 is perhaps one of the biggest gaps out there. It's been in service in relatively large numbers for a long time now, and has never been addressed in 1/48 (anyone citing the Lindberg kit needs to have their head checked).

MiG-25 (and variants), MiG-31 are now all the more glaring holes due to this announcement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The MiG-31 is perhaps one of the biggest gaps out there. It's been in service in relatively large numbers for a long time now, and has never been addressed in 1/48 (anyone citing the Lindberg kit needs to have their head checked).

MiG-25 (and variants), MiG-31 are now all the more glaring holes due to this announcement.

Other big gaps in 1:48 and 1:32 Warsaw Pact aircraft are decent MIG-23BN kits, as well as the whole range of MIG-27 versions. And in big scale we are missing a Su-17/22 family.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...