mawz
Members-
Content Count
1,099 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
mawz started following F-18E V F-18F, RF-4B confusion, Eduard 1/48 'The Bloody Hundredth' 1943 B-17F Flying Fortress Release Status? and 7 others
-
And the 45 F4H-1F/F-4A’s were thin wing
-
Worth noting the MiG-31 and B-17F are just about identical in length, the wingspan of the B-17 is much greater though.
-
Eduard has an aftermarket set as well - EDU648577
-
According to Joe Baugher’s serial list, it certainly was a FIAT assembled machine, 56-4123, went to the Venezuelan AF afterwards
-
But the Mk2 and Mk4 are not mutually interchangeable. The first 20 Mk2's were F-86A's except for the engine with the remainder of Mk2 production actually a mix of F-86A and F-86E features. to model a Sabre 2 you really need an F-86A windscreen on an F-86E airframe for an airframe from unit 21 onwards, for the first 20 you need an F-86A model with the original stab. While the Mk4 was close to a later production F-86E.
-
This is not correct, the US acquired Canadair-built Mk4's on RAF retirement and called them F-86E(M)'s, All but 10 Mk4's were delivered to the RAF, 10 went to the RCAF directly (the RCAF also had loaners from the RAF while waiting for Sabre 5 deliveries to make it to Europe). The F-86E(M)'s were all being refurbished and provided as military assistance and not operated by the USAF except for ferry flights to the new owners. The F-86E-CAN's were Sabre Mk2's, of which the USAF received 60 new build units, the only Canadair Sabres the USAF ever officially had on strength.
-
The Sabre 6 wing is essentially identical to the F-86F-40 wing with the extension section removed (the F-40 wing is an extended span version of the Mk6 slatted 6-3 wing). So it's quite possible to do a Sabre 6 from an F-86F-40 with a tip trim, some small rescribing as described above and a set of sugar scoops. The Hasegawa kit has a plastic F-40 wing that you remove the section outboard of the ailerons and replace with resin tips, resulting in an accurate Sabre 6 wing. The Airfix F-40 IIRC includes the standard tips which can be fitted after the F-40 leading edge/tips are fitted and the
-
The RCAF also had Mk.4’s for a while, loaned from the RAF. the Airfix kit is fundamentally a Canadair Mk4
-
That's not a P-51A, but a P-51 or Mustang Mk1A so if you're looking at P-51A sheets you won't find anything. Markings were generally very plan for these aircraft in both RAF/RCAF and USAAF service. Generally all you need is serials and roundels, possibly generic codes.
-
1/48 Amusing Hobby Me262 HGIII Review/Preview
mawz replied to Ranger_Chris61's topic in Jet Modeling
Those main gear legs look really odd though, they look to have the oleo fully extended, which is wrong for anything sitting on the ground.- 1 reply
-
- review
- amusing hobby
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Would make more sense that the intake was initially painted as a unit, so whatever the length of the section would be camo. Like Gene, I can't see anything more than the lip itself making sense from a camo perspective, so the only real sense would be what's easiest for the shop.
-
One note is that the F-4EJ used a different seat from an early F-4B. Is it possible that the no step was for the Mk5 and the later Mk7’s allowed stepping?
-
And the FAC(A) mission comes down to having a GIB to spot and run the radios.
-
Getting an S from a J requires a fair bit of work, mostly to the wing. You can definitely get there from a J, since the originals are upgraded J's Steel Beach used to do a conversion set, but it'll probably be easier and cheaper to just buy an S kit than to track down a conversion.
-
I have a small gap at the front of the spine, which I suspect is at least half due to order of assembly. I think if you put the aft canopy hinge coaming on after the spine, you have minimal issues and if you do the opposite you have real issues. I had no issues with the radome, but the lower wing/nose section to nose section was challenging to get together right and has minor gaps.