ElectroSoldier

Not used this company, cant say anything about them, but I can vouch for Reskit. They are expensive but worth it, the detail is second to none.

They were used for test dropping of weapons from those stations. So at some point it did test for instance the dropping of the BLU-27 from a TER (something Ive seen photos of) but beyond that. I cant find any evidence they were ever even taken to places where any of the jets were used. Not to say it didnt happen, but I cant find any evidence of it. Be that photos or even memories of people who worked those places. I cant find anybody who saw them in Vietnam when used there. When the Fs were at Mountain Home I believe they were in storage (at the base), however that is only going from th

I wonder how many generations this puts the west behind Russia now.

IPv6?

Does anybody know what his widow did with the tooling?

The nose and tail is more aerodynamic.

They used an adapter but Im not sure what it was called off hand, I would have to look that one up.

If you are using the shoulder pylons for the AIM-9 then it will be the P model with the cranked arrow front fins, if its mounted to the pylon then they were AIM-9L/M models.

Looks Like Klaus has finished his alimony payments Looking at that lot its easy to see why Cutting Edge had such a good reputation in the business. There are some wonderful subjects on those sheets.

They were planted before that, that is just when the physical manifestation of rejection started in some quarters. I was there many times over the years in many different places in the country... Its come to far and Im no longer listening. Ive little if anything to say about it anymore, especially here on this forum, I come to enjoy models.

Do you mean in 2014 or 2022? Be careful with the answer because depending on what way you go with that determines what part of your idea falls apart. No I said what I meant. You dont get to decide for me, you dont get to rewrite my words. You can call it how you want to, it doesnt change what is happening, and I no longer care what people like you think because what will be will be and its becoming clear there is little to nothing you can do about it.

Ive receieved several packages from Ukraine since the start of the SMO and none of them have been subject to import taxes into the UK. Which is odd as before they were always taxes to pay that were doubled up with admin fees.

Yeah Im starting to get the idea the kit doesnt actually exist in reality in spite of the listings on web sites. Can you look at this, with particular refrence to the sprue with the nose parts on and tell me if it can build a version with the SLAR nose MiG-25RB/RBS "Foxbat-B/D" Kittyhawk 80113 (super-hobby.co.uk)

It is Kitty Hawk not ICM. I bought this. Kitty Hawk Model 1/48 Mikoyan Mig-25RB/RBS # 80113 | eBay But what turned up was this. MiG-25RB/RBT Foxbat, Kitty Hawk KH80113 (2018) (scalemates.com) Looking at the scalemates site the RBS kit doesnt seem to exist at all. Hannants had the RB/RBS kit photo on their site but having emailed them to confirm what it is it turns out it is the RB/RBT kit. If the KittyHawk RBS version doesnt really exist outside of that box art is there an RBS kit at all? The colour cockpit panels decal do label it as an R

Im looking for some help with the Kitty Hawk MiG-25 kits of the RB/RBS and RB/RBT What is the difference between these two kits as I cant seem to see any at all apart from the S which doesnt seem to be covered in the RBS kit at all.