Jump to content

JEN722

Members
  • Content Count

    1,105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About JEN722

  • Rank
    Full Blown Model Geek

Profile Information

  • Location
    Denmark
  • Interests
    Military aviation from 1935 to present day.

Recent Profile Visitors

9,144 profile views
  1. So far I have been unable to locate some drawings. I will keep looking. Jens
  2. The "ALQ" designation does not make it similar in any way. The AN/ALQ-131 has a rectangular shape and is different in practically every single way. None of the 'add-on' AN/ALQ pods would be useful. Niels, I can see if I can find a drawing of it. It seems to me I have seen such drawing once, but I will have to check my references. Either way, it should be easy to make it yourself. Jens
  3. Thanks for the heads-up. The interesting thing is that the MENG F-4E has decals for two FY71 airframes, but MENG failed to provide the TISEO. The ARN-101 is there though. Jens
  4. You're right! I believe the issue was that the wings have the reinforcement strap/belly strap, and the TISEO/ARN aircraft are reinforced from within. Isn't that right? Jens
  5. I believe they were AN/ALR-69 pods. The Dutch might have used the same type. Does this help? Jens
  6. Despite Z-M naming it a 'late' F-4E, ít really is more of a mid-F-4E. The kit lacks the TISEO and ARN-101 of late F-4Es, so you have to look for FY67-69 airframes if you want a correct F-4E. The USAFE Phantom sheet should contain some FY68 airframes as they were present in USAFE too. Jens
  7. The Wolf3D set has been released. Jens
  8. They usually carried them on sta. 2/8. 😉 Jens
  9. I believe there was something about either the strength of the wings or the wiring inside the wings in relation to fitting the AMRAAM, something the block 10s couldn't on stations 1/9. Jens
  10. I am pretty sure our block 10s did not have the ability to mount pods on the intakes. Also, the stabs remained the earlier type. Jens
  11. Not all of them. All of our remaining block 10 (including block 1/5 airframes) F-16s went through MLU too. Jens
  12. It was only the last 10 (TEN) RF-4Bs that had the bulged wings (all BuNo 1573xx airframes). This has been confirmed many years ago, but the wrong number '12' keeps gettting repeated. Jens
  13. I am pretty sure the pylons you are looking are included in the Cutting Edge F-104S conversion kit. That would be a much better option than the ancient and rough Esci parts. Jens
  14. If you have an pair of leftover afterburners from the Tamiya F-16C block 30/40/50 they will fit the F-14B too. They are very close to having the same diameter. Jens
  15. You are right in stating that only the last TEN (10) RF-4Bs had the thicker/bulged wings. Unfortunately many references mention 12 - probably from the same incorrect source. Jens
×
×
  • Create New...